Skip main navigation

Outdated or Unsupported Browser Detected
DWD's website uses the latest technology. This makes our site faster and easier to use across all devices. Unfortunatley, your browser is out of date and is not supported. An update is not required, but it is strongly recommended to improve your browsing experience. To update Internet Explorer to Microsoft Edge visit their website.

149 Miscellaneous

The Complainant’s veiled references to an affirmative action plan and to a discrimination lawsuit against the Respondent were not enough to establish that the Respondent’s reasons for hiring a female rather than a male were pre-textual. Zurawski v. LIRC (Racine Co. Cir. Ct., 12/22/88).

It is not a defense to an employment discrimination complaint that the DILHR Division of Apprenticeship and Training had advised the employer to test exclusively minority applicants for a two-month period in order to augment certification lists and comply with federal contract requirements. However, the white applicants failed to establish a prima facie case where they did not show that the two-month testing of exclusively minority applicants kept them out of the apprenticeship programs. Brown v. AMC (DILHR, 09/10/76).