Skip main navigation

Outdated or Unsupported Browser Detected
DWD's website uses the latest technology. This makes our site faster and easier to use across all devices. Unfortunatley, your browser is out of date and is not supported. An update is not required, but it is strongly recommended to improve your browsing experience. To update Internet Explorer to Microsoft Edge visit their website.

121.3 Compensation, benefits

Although an employer paid 90% of the insurance premiums, it did not discriminate against a 56-year-old teacher who was rejected for the insurance program because of high blood pressure where the employer's only role was to pass out the insurance applications. King v. Wausau Sch. (LIRC, 12/08/78).M

The grant of a merit increase to all custodial workers except two who were close to retirement and “non-retainable” was age discrimination. Risler v. First Wis. Nat'l Bank (DILHR, 06/26/75).