Outdated or Unsupported Browser Detected
DWD's website uses the latest technology. This makes our site faster and easier to use across all devices. Unfortunatley, your browser is out of date and is not supported. An update is not required, but it is strongly recommended to improve your browsing experience. To update Internet Explorer to Microsoft Edge visit their website.
To be considered an independent contractor and not an employee, an individual must meet and maintain all nine of the requirements listed below. To assist the employer in the analysis, the department has provided the following:
The individual maintains a separate business with his or her own office, equipment, materials and other facilities.
An employing unit satisfies this condition by showing that the applicant maintains some space somewhere that resembles an office or "facility" or chooses the place to perform the services. The space or facility need not be a traditional office. The individual also uses either materials or equipment that are his or her own. The individual is not choosing the location when the employing unit requires the individual to travel to a designated route, to canvass a territory within a certain amount of time or to work at specific places.
Case Studies
Case studies relevant to Requirement One based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts and Wisconsin Appellate Courts
The individual obtains a Federal Employer Identification Number (FEIN) from the Federal Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or has filed business or self-employment income tax returns with the IRS based on the work or service in the previous year.
An employing unit satisfies this requirement by showing that the applicant obtained a Federal Employer Identification number from the Federal Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or has filed business or self-employment income tax returns with the IRS based on the work or service in the previous year. A social security number cannot be substituted for a FEIN and does not meet the legal burden of Section 102.07(8), Wis. Stats.
Case Studies
Case studies relevant to Requirement Two based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts and Wisconsin Appellate Courts
The individual operates under contracts to perform specific services or work for specific amounts of money and under which the independent contractor controls the means of performing the services or work.
An employing unit satisfies this requirement by showing that the applicant operates under contracts to perform specific services or work both for specific amounts of money and under which the independent contractor controls the means of performing the services or work.
The contracts may be either written or verbal.
An independent contractor controls how he or she performs the work. An employer does not generally provide an independent contractor with instructions on how to perform the work.
An independent contractor is free to set his or her own hours. An independent contractor is free to determine in what order or sequence to perform his or her duties. An employee is required by the employer to perform his or her services at times or in a particular order or sequence established by the employer.
Case Studies
Case studies relevant to Requirement Three based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts and Wisconsin Appellate Courts
The individual incurs the main expenses related to the service or work that he or she performs under contract
An employing unit satisfies this requirement by:
Based upon the above three determinations, the employing unit can then make a final determination as to whether the main part of those related expenses was incurred by the person whose status is at issue.
Case Studies
Case studies relevant to Requirement Four based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts and Wisconsin Appellate Courts
The individual is responsible for the satisfactory completion of work or services that he or she contracts to perform and is liable for a failure to complete the work or service.
An employing unit satisfies this requirement by showing that the individual was:
Case Studies
Case studies relevant to Requirement Five based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts and Wisconsin Appellate Courts
The individual receives compensation for work or service performed under a contract on a commission or per job or competitive bid basis and not on any other basis.
An employing unit satisfies this requirement by showing that the individual:
Case Studies
Case studies relevant to Requirement Six based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts and Wisconsin Appellate Courts
The individual may realize a profit or suffer a loss under contracts to perform work or services
This requirement examines whether, under a contract for the individual's services, there can be a profit, as well as whether there can be a loss under that same contract. A profit means that income received under the contract exceeds the expenses incurred in performing the contract. A loss means the income received under that contract fails to cover the expenses incurred in performing the contract.
The potential for profit and the potential for loss need to be evaluated by looking at the specific contracts the individual enters into. This test does not look at the question of whether, in the long run, income received through the individual's business will exceed expenses, or vice-versa. Rather, it looks at the question of whether under particular contracts the individual enters into, there can be a profit or there can be a loss.
Case Studies
Case studies relevant to Requirement Seven based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts and Wisconsin Appellate Courts
The individual has continuing or recurring business liabilities or obligations
An employing unit satisfies this requirement by showing that the worker has proof of a cost of doing business which the worker would incur even during a period the worker was not performing work for the employer. Such costs may include, but are not limited to, an office lease, professional fees or liability insurance.
Case Studies
Case studies relevant to Requirement Eight based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts and Wisconsin Appellate Courts
The success or failure of the independent contractor's business depends on the relationship of business receipts to expenditures.
An employing unit satisfies this requirement by showing that the worker is in a position to succeed or fail if business expense exceeds income.
The individual must face a realistic prospect of a significant time period during which he or she would necessarily have expenditures but not receipts.
If the individual is guaranteed to receive the amount expected from the employing unit without any possibility of loss, the requirement is not satisfied.
Case Studies
Case studies relevant to Requirement Nine based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts and Wisconsin Appellate Courts