Outdated or Unsupported Browser Detected
DWD's website uses the latest technology. This makes our site faster and easier to use across all devices. Unfortunatley, your browser is out of date and is not supported. An update is not required, but it is strongly recommended to improve your browsing experience. To update Internet Explorer to Microsoft Edge visit their website.
The second part of the two part test to determine if a worker is an employee or an independent contractor is the "six of nineconditions" test.
In addition to being free of the employer's control or direction, the worker must meet six of nine conditions to be considered an independent contractor. If the worker does not meet six of nine conditions, the worker is an employee, even though the worker may be free from the employer's control or direction.
The department has provided the following tools for each of the nine conditions to assist the employer with the analysis of each of the conditions:
The individual advertises or otherwise affirmatively holds himself or herself out as being in business.
The worker must make the public aware that he or she is engaged in a business endeavor. This can be accomplished by some form of advertising, such as using business cards, posting notices regarding the services, or having an actual place of business.
Case Studies
Cases studies relevant to condition one based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industrial Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts, and Wisconsin Appellate Courts
The individual maintains his or her own office or performs most of the services in a facility or location chosen by the individual and uses his or her own equipment or materials in performing the services.
This is a two-part condition. The worker meets this condition by having his or her own office or choosing the place to perform the services, and using his or her own materials or equipment in performing the services. The worker is not choosing the location when the employing unit requires the worker to travel a designated route, to canvass a territory within a certain amount of time or to work at specific places.
Case Studies
Cases studies relevant to condition two based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industrial Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts, and Wisconsin Appellate Courts
The individual operates under multiple contracts with one or more employing units to perform specific services.
The worker meets this condition by having contracts with more than one employing unit to perform services, or by having more than one contract with one employing unit. Contracts with an employing unit can be either written or verbal.
Case Studies
Cases studies relevant to condition three based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industrial Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts, and Wisconsin Appellate Courts
The individual incurs the main expenses related to the services he or she provides under contract.
The appropriate application of this condition requires:
Case Studies
Cases studies relevant to condition four based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industrial Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts, and Wisconsin Appellate Courts
The individual is obligated to redo unsatisfactory work for no additional compensation or is subject to a monetary penalty for unsatisfactory work.
If the work performed by the worker is not satisfactory to the employing unit, the worker must redo the work without being paid additional money or incurring a monetary penalty.
Case Studies
Cases studies relevant to condition five based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industrial Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts, and Wisconsin Appellate Courts
The services performed by the individual do not directly relate to the employing unit retaining the services.
The services provided to the employing unit by the worker must be substantially different from the employing unit's business, and must not be directly related to, or be integrated into, the employing unit's business.
For example, where an employing unit that manufactures furniture engages a worker to fabricate upholstery for chairs that the employing unit sells, the worker's services performed to make or assemble the upholstery material for the chairs are directly related to, and integrated into, the employing unit's product.
On the other hand, where a worker is hired to paint the building in which the employing unit's manufacturing business is located, the painting work is not integrated into the business activity of the employing unit.
Case Studies
Cases studies relevant to condition six based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industrial Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts, and Wisconsin Appellate Courts
The individual may realize a profit or suffer a loss under contracts to perform such services.
This condition examines whether, under a contract for the worker's services, there can be a profit, as well as whether there can be a loss under that same contract. A profit means that income received under the contract exceeds the expenses incurred in performing the contract. A loss means the income received under that contract fails to cover the expenses incurred in performing the contract.
The potential for profit and the potential for loss need to be evaluated by looking at the specific contracts the worker enters into with the employing unit, and determining whether over the entire length of the contractual relationship, there is a realistic possibility that the worker could realize a profit or suffer a loss.
Case Studies
Cases studies relevant to condition seven based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industrial Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts, and Wisconsin Appellate Courts
The individual has recurring business liabilities or obligations.
This condition requires proof of a cost of doing business that the worker would incur even during a period the worker was not performing work for the employing unit. Such costs may include, but are not limited to, an office lease, professional fee, or liability insurance.
Case Studies
Cases studies relevant to condition eight based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industrial Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts, and Wisconsin Appellate Courts
The individual is not economically dependent upon a particular employing unit with respect to the services being performed.
If an examination of the of the economic relationship between the worker and the employing unit establishes that the worker is independent of the employing unit, performs services and then moves on to perform similar services for another, it is evidence of an independent trade or business. On the other hand, if the economic relationship shows a strong dependence by the worker upon the employing unit, it is evidence that the worker is an employee.
Case Studies
Cases studies relevant to condition nine based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industrial Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts, and Wisconsin Appellate Courts