Outdated or Unsupported Browser Detected
DWD's website uses the latest technology. This makes our site faster and easier to use across all devices. Unfortunatley, your browser is out of date and is not supported. An update is not required, but it is strongly recommended to improve your browsing experience. To update Internet Explorer to Microsoft Edge visit their website.
Wis. Admin. Code Chapter DWD 105 (Relationships of Carriers and Contract Operators) determines whether or not a trucker who is a contract operator for a licensed motor carrier is an employee for the purposes of unemployment insurance. (See Wis. Admin. Code § DWD 100.02 for definitions of "carrier" and "contract operator" and Wis. Stat. § 108.02 (25e) for the definition of "trucker".)
According to Wis. Admin. Code § DWD 105, an employer must examine the following eight factors to determine, both under contract and in fact, whether the trucker/contract operator is free from the motor carrier's direction and control:
If all eight of the factors above are present, the contract operator will be found by the department to be free from the employer's direction and control.
If one or more of the eight factors above are not present in the relationship between the carrier and contract operator, you must analyze the following six additional factors to determine, both under contract and in fact, whether:
Under the law, the six factors are considered, but no one factor or particular combination of factors controls the determination of whether the contract operator is under the direction and control of the employer.
If the contract operator is not free of direction and control of the carrier, the contract operator is an employee for purposes of unemployment insurance.
If after applying the above test, the contract operator is found to be free from the employer's direction and control, the next question is whether the contract operator is "performing these services for the carrier in an independently established business in which the contract operator is customarily engaged".
Case Studies