Outdated or Unsupported Browser Detected
DWD's website uses the latest technology. This makes our site faster and easier to use across all devices. Unfortunatley, your browser is out of date and is not supported. An update is not required, but it is strongly recommended to improve your browsing experience. To update Internet Explorer to Microsoft Edge visit their website.
The first part of the two part test to determine if a worker is an employee or an independent contractor is "control or direction."
The purpose of this part of the test is to determine if the worker is operating free from the control or direction of the employing unit. If the worker is found not to be free of the employing unit's control or direction the worker is an employee and not an independent contractor, and it is not necessary to consider the conditions in the second part of the test.
This part of the test provides five important factors to consider in determining whether an individual performs services free from the control or direction of the employing unit. However, they are not the only factors that may be considered, and each factor is not essential in every case and may be weighted differently depending upon the facts of the case.
The department has provided the following tools for each of the five factors to assist with the analysis of each of the factors:
Whether the individual is required to comply with instructions concerning how to perform the services.
An employing unit satisfies this factor by showing that instructions on how to perform the work are generally not given to this worker. Instructions may be given in various forms, such as the employing unit's policies and procedures.
Case Studies
Cases studies relevant to factor one based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industrial Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts, and Wisconsin Appellate Courts
Whether the individual receives training from the employing unit with respect to the services performed.
Training can be formal or informal. It can be in the classroom or "on the job."
An employing unit satisfies this factor by showing that such training is generally not given to the worker.
Case Studies
Cases studies relevant to factor two based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industrial Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts, and Wisconsin Appellate Courts
Whether the individual is required to personally perform the services.
An employing unit satisfies this factor by showing that such restrictions are generally not placed on the worker. The worker is not expected personally to do the work assigned by the employing unit, but instead is permitted by the employing unit to hire another person to perform some or all of the work or subcontract his or her work to another person.
Case Studies
Cases studies relevant to factor three based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industrial Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts, and Wisconsin Appellate Courts
Whether the services of the individual are required to be performed at times or in a particular order or sequence established by the employing unit.
An employing unit satisfies this factor by showing that the time and sequence of services performed are generally not established by the employing unit. The worker is free to set his or her own hours and determine in what order or sequence to perform his or her duties.
Case Studies
Cases studies relevant to factor four based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industrial Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts, and Wisconsin Appellate Courts
Whether the individual is required to make oral or written reports to the employing unit on a regular basis.
An employing unit satisfies this factor by showing that the worker is not required to submit reports of his or her work activities to the employing unit.
Case Studies
Cases studies relevant to factor five based upon cases decided by the Labor and Industrial Review Commission (LIRC), Wisconsin Circuit Courts, and Wisconsin Appellate Courts